Greg Anderson, back to jail

While Greg Anderson, Bonds' former trainer, has (have) been more than a year in jail for not testifying against Bonds, and (b) the practical limit of the refusal to testify against Bonds is the torque future weeks, the trial has to perform, it is not surprising that Anderson again refused to testify against Bonds.

He sat County for a week or two. Then you continue the life he has lived all these years. Compared to previous stint, you can do standing on his head.


More specifically, the judge stated:

Illston agreed to issue a certificate of Kimberly Bell, former lover of Bond, in relation to physical and psychological changes that could see Bonds.

According to the indictment, these changes include how Bell account the elimination of the Bonds of the testicles and the deterioration in sexual performance, the government said to indicate the use of steroids

. Judge Bell will also describe an incident in which she said Bonds had grabbed her neck and threatened.

With the caveat that I have not read the papers, I have no idea how this comes into play on most - the absolute best - it could be a sign of good use of steroids. But this test is not whether Bonds used steroids. He all but admitted that he did in his initial grand jury testimony and the prosecutor will introduce a positive doping test in this direction. That this trial is about is whether the obligations knew that Anderson gave him steroids. What this thing has to do with knowledge?

I think that since Bell had nothing to add to the burden, statements would be heard from Bonds suggests he knew exactly what he took. How the hell in the testicles and the good that was in the bag seems quite out of place to the extent that the rules of evidence are concerned.

Furthermore, I agree with counsel for the obligations of harm because of his testimony about an alleged incident of domestic violence far outweigh any that might have relevance to the issues in this cases. People who are not steroids commit domestic violence every day. Some of the most juiced athletes in history have the wonderful family. How does this tell us something? What, other than obligations to make it look like a bad person in the eyes of the jury - should I do?

Well, at least it will give lawyers the opportunity to grill Bell Bonds on the methods it uses to estimate the relative size of the testicles and sexual performance during her relationship with Bonds. I think his credibility test, right? Hey, if the prosecution wants to make this frightening spectacle, let us make a spectacle in its own disaster.